Pakistan, China to Enter Nuke Cooperation Deal?

Filed Under (China) by admin on 27-05-2008

Tagged Under : , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Jintao
onlyonce asked:


(Economic Times, Aug 14, 2006) ISLAMABAD: Pakistan and China are close to finalising a landmark accord on nuclear energy cooperation, under which Islamabad will acquire six reactors of 300 megawatts each.

The accord, which shows Pakistan playing its “China card” to beat the India-US nuclear energy deal now undergoing legislative processes in the US, may be signed during the visit of Chinese President Hu Jintao to Pakistan this November, according to reports.

“Negotiations on nuclear energy cooperation between Pakistan and China are in final stages and the deal is most likely to be reached during the forthcoming visit of Chinese President Hu Jintao in November this year,” said the official on Friday.

He disclosed that Pakistan also wanted to acquire a nuclear power reactor of 600 megawatts from China, but the Chinese source:http://www.zoomchina.com.cn/index.php?/content/view/11107/1/

The Tax Lady Roni Deutch Analyzes the Tax Views of Sen. Barack Obama

Filed Under (United States) by admin on 27-05-2008

Tagged Under : , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

obama
Roni Deutch asked:


Higher Taxes on Top Earning AmericansSenator Obama is a big believer in our progressive tax system – and he is not afraid to hide that. So one of the first things Obama is set to do is letting President Bush’s 2001 and 2003 tax cuts to selectively expire. He also advocates increasing the income cap on payroll taxes. This would essentially be a huge tax increase for taxpayers earning between $97,000.00 and $250,000.00, which goes against Obama’s prior commitment to not raise taxes on individuals making less than $250,000.00. Although higher taxes on the rich is a popular thought for many liberals, you cannot expect to only tax the rich and cut taxes for the poor. The American public is not likely to support unbalanced tax increases and this could harm his chances in the general election.Close Corporate Loop-HolesAnother major component of Obama’s tax plan is to close hundreds of corporate “loop-holes” that allow massive corporations to questionably reduce their tax liability. “Instead of having all of us pay our fair share, we’ve got over $1 trillion worth of loopholes in the corporate tax code,” he claimed. “This isn’t the invisible hand of the market at work. It’s the successful work of special interests.” This plan would be highly efficient at creating new revenue for the federal government, but at what cost? Huge corporations are already moving factories and offices to countries with cheaper labor and more favorable corporate taxes. If the tax rates increase too much, then more corporations would likely move out of the country and it could result in thousands of lost jobs.Senior Citizen Tax BreaksAlthough it seems like an attempt to get the attention of the “senior voters” and the AARP, Obama is hoping to provide relief to millions of seniors struggling to make ends meet. His plan would eliminate federal taxes on seniors making less then $50,000.00 per year, which would account for $7 million dollars in total relief. It seems quite unlikely that the country would get behind this tax plan. I also have my own reservations – what about single mothers making less than $50,000 per year – that I expressed in a previous entry.Make Work Pay Tax CreditWith his Make Work Pay tax credit, Obama is hoping to encourage Americans to take control of their lives, while providing tax relief to both low and middle income taxes. “I’d reward work by providing an income tax cut of up to $500 per person – or $1,000 for each working family – to offset the payroll tax that they’re already paying,” claimed Obama. “Because this credit would be greater than their income tax bill, my proposal would effectively eliminate all income taxes for 10 million working Americans.”Capital Gain Tax IncreaseObama’s desire to increase the Capital Gains rate is probably the biggest actual increase of his tax plan. The current tax rate on Capital Gains is 15%, and Obama hopes to raise it to 28%. But although the Capital Gains tax rate is much lower today than it was a decade ago, it is being levied on a lot more people. Investing is not only for the rich, as there are millions of middle income Americans investing in stocks, retirement accounts, and mutual funds. In a time of a looming economic recession, we should be encouraging sound investment and savings strategies. Raising the capital gains rate is not going to do that.Mortgage Relief for Homeowners”Ten of the country’s largest mortgage lenders spent $185 million lobbying Washington so they could keep engaging in destructive practices,” claimed Obama. “And they got what they paid for. To help fix this problem Obama wants to create more accountability in the mortgage industry. In addition, he intends to pursue more tax breaks for current homeowners. Specifically, Obama announced intentions to “create a 10 percent universal mortgage credit to provide homeowners who do not itemize tax relief.”Because it is a credit, individuals claiming the standard deduction would have access to it. Currently, mortgage interest is a deduction that can only be claimed by itemizing your deductions on your tax return. The credit would provide about $500 to 10 million homeowners in this country, mainly for individuals making less than $50,000 per year.Revamp the AMTAlthough Obama voted “nay” on repealing the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT), he does support a revamp of the tax. The specific details of his plan are a bit hazy, but Obama has claimed he would like to index the tax according to inflation so that it does not affect middle-income Americans. However, with dozens of social plans that cost billions of dollars to operate, the idea of reducing a tax that generates so much revenue for the government seems unlikely.American Opportunity Tax CreditOne of Obama’s more popular tax views is to help make higher education more affordable for Americans by creating a credit to reimburse taxpayers for the costs of obtaining a college education. According to his plan, the credit would reimburse taxpayers on the first $4,000.00 they spend on a college education, and will cover two-thirds of the cost of attending a public college or university.Immigration Reform and Undocumented Immigrant TaxesObama wants to reform the way the federal government deals with undocumented immigrants. Obama’s plan does have tax consequences, as it would not only require illegal aliens to file tax returns and pay income taxes, but would also require them to pay back taxes and the associated penalties and interest. If this idea became reality, it could account for millions of dollars in additional federal revenue. And, by not including tax amnesty in his immigration reform, Obama preemptively “plucks” a feather from the anti-immigration reform movement. It also preemptively stops American citizens from lobbying for similar treatment for their own unfiled tax returns and IRS back taxes.

The Probability of Victory is Higher for Senator Obama Than for Senator Mccain

Filed Under (United States) by admin on 26-05-2008

Tagged Under : , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

obama
Gurumurthy Kalyanaram asked:


The probability of Obama winning the Presidential elections in November appears to be pretty robust. Here is why –
(1) Based on public polls, it is becoming evident that Obama is most likely to hold all the states (Michigan appears close but it is trending Obama’s way) that Kerry won in 2004. That would give Obama 252 electoral votes. Add to this Iowa which is almost certain to go to Obama — 7 electoral votes. That gives Obama 259 electoral votes.
On the other hand, McCain — at this stage — is not likely to win all the stages that Bush won in 2004 (284 electoral votes.) McCain is almost sure to lose Iowa (7 electoral votes.) Add to this mix, Ohio (20 electoral votes), Virginia (13 electoral votes), Colorado (9 electoral votes), and New Mexico and Nevada (each with 5 electoral votes) — there is substantial doubt if McCain can hold these states. That puts McCain at about 225 electoral votes.
(2) The more compelling arithmetic is this. Repeatedly, in large numbers of public polls about 37-38 percent of the likely voters identify themselves as Democrats and about 30 percent as republicans. That leaves about 30 percent as independents. (The Newsweek preference measure which shows that about 55 percent of the voters identify themselves as Democrats and 36 percent as Republicans is an outlier.)
Assuming both Obama and McCain get 80 percent of their party votes, the differential gain for Obama would be about 6.5 percent. In the cross-over vote of 20 percent, Obama would lose about 1.5 percent leaving a net lead of about 5 percent for Obama. Assuming that Obama and McCain split the independents, Obama’s overall lead would be about 5 percent.
The only caveat is the potential Bradley-Wilder effect which accounts for about 5-7 percent.
(3) What adds to the odds of Obama’s victory are three other elements: the enormous enthusiasm among democrats and much muted demeanor of the republicans (enthusiasm translates into higher voting percentage and greater voter mobilization, in some cases the enthusiasm gap between the democrats and republicans is as high as 30 points), the extra-ordinarily low approval ratings (in low 30s) of President Bush and the perception that the country is heading in the wrong direction (over 64-70 percent of Americans say this.)

can someone give me the countries, dates, and a discription of the following events?

Filed Under (Poland) by admin on 24-05-2008

Tagged Under : , , , , , , , , , , , ,

walesa
Dahlia M asked:


domino effect, korean war, sputnik launched, I.C.B.Ms (firsy launched), U-2 incident, czechoslovakia invaded by warsaw pact, SALT 1 treaty signed, Helsinki Accords, soveits invade afganistan, SALT 2 treaty abandoned, Truman doctrine, european steel and coal community, brezhnev doctrine, lech walesa, solidarity movement, gdansk agreement.

Perestroika was the economic plan of:?

Filed Under (Poland) by admin on 24-05-2008

Tagged Under : , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

walesa
Taly S asked:


a. Mikhail Gorbachev
b. Geoge Bush
c. Ronald Reagan
d. Lech Walesa

George Bush’s running mate in the 1988 presidential election was:
a. Ronald Reagan
b. Dan Quayle
c. Jesse Jackson
d. Michael Dukakis

The Polish leader of the Solidarity movement who emerged as a symbol of resistance to Communist rule was:
a. Lech Walesa
b. Saddam Hussein
c. Mikhail Gorbachev
d. Boris Yeltsin

Je cherche un ami Marc Delplanque (dernier adresse: Rue Lech Walesa , Nice, France?

Filed Under (Poland) by admin on 23-05-2008

Tagged Under : , ,

walesa
Mil D asked:


Evnoyez moi un email.. If you know about him, pls email me..

Bill Clinton

Filed Under (United States) by admin on 22-05-2008

Tagged Under : , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

clinton
Ernie Fitzpatrick asked:


When the dust settles on this primary election cycle I think pundits and historians will mostly all agree that Bill Clinton was Hillary’s undoing. His game worked when it was him attacking them, when it was Bill versus the right wing conspiracy; however, when it is Bill versus “other Democrats” it is an abject failure. Democrats are now looking in the mirror and seeing the “Clinton myth” and it’s not a pretty picture at all. The latest Bill Clinton attack, as subtle as it was, didn’t go unnoticed!

What was the headline this past weekend from Bubba? “John McCain and Hillary Clinton love America. So wouldn’t it be great to see those two who love America vie for the presidential title? Surely you get the inference! And it is statements just like this that’s turning the Democratic party away from Hillary as much as for Obama- who is at least conciliatory in his comments.

Hillary is just barely holding on. To what?

Hillary Clinton has virtually no chance of winning. Her own campaign acknowledges there is no way that she will finish ahead in pledged delegates. That The notion of the Democratic contest being a dramatic cliffhanger is a game of make-believe.means the only way she wins is if Democratic super delegates are ready to risk a backlash of historic proportions from the party’s most reliable constituency. Unless Clinton is able to at least win the primary popular vote, which also would take nothing less than an electoral miracle, and use that achievement to pressure super delegates (like Bill Richardson?), she has only one scenario for victory. An African-American opponent and his backers would be told that, even though he won the contest with voters, the prize is going to someone else.

The Clinton invincibility myth is dying a slow death, and with it the Hillary Clinton campaign.

The notion of the Democratic contest being a dramatic cliffhanger is a game of make-believe.The real question is why so many people believing that she has a chance, other than pulling off some back-room shady deal? The answer has more to do with media psychology than with practical politics.

Meanwhile, Bubba’s latest comments are causing the Hillary Clinton campaign to bob and weave, saying the comments were being misinterpreted and quickly posting a clarification on its Web site. But retired Air Force Gen. Merrill McPeak said he was disappointed by the comments and compared them to those of McCarthy, the 1950s communist-hunting senator.

Hey Bill. The fat lady is walking up the steps to take the microphone.

What is the best way to prepare my rose bush for winter?

Filed Under (United States) by admin on 19-05-2008

Tagged Under : ,

bush
digitaldancer22 asked:


I live in PA and the cold is really starting to roar in. We just planted a beautiful rose bush in our yard this past summer and i am unsure how to winterize it so it doesn’t die.

thank you for your help!

How can i get maximum yield from my raspberry bush?

Filed Under (United States) by admin on 19-05-2008

Tagged Under : , , ,

bush
Squarehead asked:


I have a huge raspberry bush. i have been cutting it down to the ground for the last 2 years and it hasn’t produced a half decent yield since about 3-4 years ago. What do i have to do to help get back to a healthy yield?

Can you trim a lilac bush every year?

Filed Under (United States) by admin on 18-05-2008

Tagged Under : , , , ,

bush
Carebear asked:


My mother in law told me that if you trim a lilac bush it wont bloom for seven years. I have some lilac bushes at my new house that are huge. They really need to be trimmed but, I’m afraid to do so now. Anybody know anything about this?